Introduction


The Past Remembered Anew:
How Childhood Moments Reveal   
Who We Are Now


Bill

The Past Remembered Anew is about two kids growing up at opposite ends of Massachusetts who eventually meet in college, get married, have kids and write this blog together. I’m Bill.  You’ll hear from Gin shortly.

Back in the 60's I met Gin at the University of Massachusetts in Amherst. She lived in Pittsfield in the far western part of the state, a city I knew nothing about. I lived a hundred and forty miles to the east of Pittsfield, in Boston, a place Gin was aware of but not familiar with. In high school Gin did travel to Boston once or twice.  Until I went to college in Amherst  I had never been further west of Boston than Framingham.  Gin lived in the provinces but I was the one who was provincial.

I remember as a kid listening to WBZ on the radio while I was getting ready for school.  "This is WBZ, Boston, and WBZA, Springfield," the announcer would say.  Massachusetts has a large city located about every fifty miles east to west. I'd heard of Worcester, fifty miles away; a tornado had spiraled through there a couple of years before, but Springfield is further, ninety miles west of Boston. Aside from the reference on 'BZ I knew nothing about it, or the famous river it was situated on, the Connecticut.  Pittsfield was another fifty miles or so west of Springfield.  Thanks to that tornado and 'BZ at least I had heard of Worcester and Springfield. Not the case with Pittsfield. Until I met Gin I didn't know the place existed.  Too bad WBZ didn't have a repeater there as well. "WBZB, Pittsfield".

Gin was familiar with my ignorance and that of others from the greater Boston area.  “Whenever anyone talks about Massachusetts, all they know about is Boston. They all think Massachusetts ends at Worcester," she used to complain. It's true. Most people in the state live east of the Connecticut River; Boston is where the legislature is, where the laws are made, laws which some allege favor the eastern half of Massachusetts over the rest. Some people casually refer to western Massachusetts as "the western part" as if that region is some sort of vague netherworld.

When we first met in Amherst in the "western part”,  Gin and I talked a lot, brought each other up to speed, sharing with each other what we had been doing all those years before we met at college.  As anyone in a passionate, surprising, first time relationship knows, you hang on every word; you listen, you learn, you're fascinated, you're in love.

It was that, and more. Gin told me of her childhood, her teenage years, about her school, her home life, stories about her brothers and sisters, of life in Pittsfield, about her feelings and experiences and adventures, the good, and not so good, the moments that string together like enormous carbon links transforming her into the person she was to become and the person she is still becoming. I responded with stories of my own life in Boston.

Eventually a picture began to emerge not only of who we were but also of the places in which we grew up.

Aside from Pittsfield and to a slight extent, Boston, there was another city which influenced Gin's ordinary life. New York City. Gin's parents went to New York for  vacations, going to the theatre and visiting jazz clubs. New Yorkers came to the Berkshires which had become a summer playground for many of the state’s well-to-do residents.

Gin's parents watched the Yankees. Occasionally she'd go to a movie in nearby Albany. Her family read the New York Herald Tribune and the New Yorker. Teenagers would drive "over the mountain" to nearby Stephentown, New York where the drinking age was lower than in Massachusetts. Gin knew more about New York, the state and the city, than I did about any place other than Boston.

As a kid, Boston was the only city I ever knew.  I thought of it as the real thing. It was big and bustling and special.  My father worked there. My brother's team was the Red Sox.  Our paper was the Boston Evening Globe.  As little kids my mother would take my brother and me "in town" for shopping and paying bills. At Christmas the whole family would go there to look at the holiday display windows. Boston had subways, tall buildings, department stores and palaces known as movie houses. To me, even at that age, Boston was a special part of my life.

As for Pittsfield, Gin never thought of it as a Boston-type city. It was smaller of course.  Going shopping or to a movie or just being with friends was never "I'm going into Pittsfield."  It was "upstreet" or "North Street",  the city's commercial center.  Pittsfield had an elevator or two and a good bus system but never a subway. No matter. Pittsfield had everything Gin could want in a city.  She didn't need Boston.

So there it was: big city/small city, a different family, different experiences, a different perspective, a different take filtered through being a boy, being a girl, the boy living first in a house next to a school in Jamaica Plain and then living in a house on top of a hill in Hyde Park; the girl moving from one local Pittsfield neighborhood to another local neighborhood every few years.  And yet...

In spite of all the differences, there were many things that connected us in those early days of discovery at college.  One was that we were born just three weeks apart in the same year. I arrived on March 5; Gin waited until after spring arrived, March 30. The year was 1945.  It meant we were in the same grades in school at the same time, we saw the same TV shows, had access to the same movies, reacted to the same news events, all from the perspective of being the same age. To a certain extent, allowing for the differences in boys and girls, we developed along the same timeline, the same grid.  

Part of our common link was our schooling, each different but still under the jurisdiction of the Massachusetts Department of Education which insured we would read the same books in English, study the same formulas and equations in math, traverse the same nationalistic road in history and geography, and suffer the same indignities in physical education.  (Wait. That last one. That could have been just me.)

And we both knew what gimp was.

There may have been a distance between us as we grew up, but there were also remarkable similarities which to a great extent determined our future paths, and perhaps also set up the forces that led to that powerful attraction so many years ago in college that still continues, in its many guises, to this day

This then is the story of that distance, long in miles, close in the entanglement of two people growing up, apart, but together.


Gin

I was walking with my husband to be, Bill, on the college campus where we met.  We were in the first flush of our relationship; words pouring out of me because I wanted to tell him everything about me and learn everything about him.  As we talked, I formed images comparing our lives. I was fascinated by our differences. 

I grew up in a small town in the rural western end of our state; he grew up in the Boston area.  I walked to the main street to go to movies; he took a train. We had one television which received two channels and those not consistently.  He had access to three TVs, one on each level of their house,  They could choose not only from the major networks but several independent stations as well.  My parents eschewed formal religions before finally settling on the Unitarian Church; Bill and his siblings were raised as Catholics.  My parents rented one side of a two family house; his family owned their own place. 

To me his life sounded faintly exotic.  All these differences.  The distance between us felt wide.

Then he started to talk about Ethan Frome.

“I read that in 10th grade,” he said. “I wondered why they let us read it.  It had such a strong undertone of sexual longing. It was adult. It didn’t seem like other books we read, Julius Caesar, Lady of the Lake…”   “…and Ivanhoe and Evangeline,” I piped in continuing the list.  Suddenly we realized, thanks to the Board of Education, our public school reading list was the same. Even more striking there is a scene in the book in which one character is injured in a sledding accident.  I told Bill, "That hill in the book is based on a real hill in Lenox, a town just a few miles south of Pittsfield." The distance between us had shrunk.  With these experiences we had a common tie.


This blog is about our growing up at opposite ends of the same state at the same time.  How our lives were the same and how they were different.  Corner stores, penny candy, movies, playgrounds, school yards, bike riding, friends, teachers, radio stations, TV shows, brothers and sisters, department stores, schools, newspapers, libraries, Sunday dinners, summer vacations, family life. All the aspects of everyday living.  The similarities, the diversity, the triumphs and tragedies, the rich complexities of life that made each of us the unique individuals we are now.



Boston and Pittsfield: the Distance Between Us




The Past Remembered Anew:
How Childhood Moments Reveal   
Who We Are Now


Bill

The two cities are not that far apart.  In the early 50's, before construction of the Massachusetts Turnpike, four or five driving hours separated Boston from Pittsfield, 138 miles.  There were a number of routes a driver could choose if they wished to transition from the urban areas of eastern Massachusetts to the more rural regions of western Massachusetts.

You could take Route 2 from Cambridge out to Concord and Lexington and then along to the central part of the state, past Fort Devins, the tiny communities of Westminster and Templeton, through Orange north of the Quabbin Reservoir, and then up to the Mohawk Trail, a lovely scenic ride even today.  The town of Florida is up there, and something called the hairpin turn which an overloaded truck, coming down the steep incline with smoking overheated brakes, would occasionally challenge. The turn always won. At Williamstown you'd head south along 7 until, eventually, there was Pittsfield.

Perhaps Route 20 would be the better alternative. The Old Post Road out of Boston meanders along an historic route, first in the more northern part of the state and then dilly dallies to a more southern approach, through Springfield and along the Westfield River gradually tracking north through the forests of Becket and the resort towns of Lee and Lenox, arriving in Pittsfield before drifting off into New York State.  

Route 9 takes you from Park Square Boston to Park Square Pittsfield, through Framingham, through Worcester, through the Brookfields, south of the Quabbin, up to Amherst, the town where Gin and I met, and then along a route basically unchanged in all the time I've been driving it, through towns like Goshen and Cummington and Dalton, and, the end of the line, Pittsfield. 

No car. Go by bus.  I used to take the Peter Pan bus from Park Square in Boston back to college in the early 60s.  I'd connect in Springfield to Umass/Amherst. There were times too when I'd continue west, taking a Bonanza bus from Springfield out along the Mass Pike to Pittsfield.

Passenger train was another mode.  Lots more trains back then. Pittsfield had a spectacular train station, ultimately a victim of urban renewal.  It was a mini Grand Central.  You could take a train there to Boston, an interesting reversal. Gin’s father and mother would use the station to travel to New York or up north to North Adams where Gin's grandparents lived. 

Pittsfield was anything but isolated.  Many connections were possible. My dearth of knowledge about Pittsfield was just another example of my ignorance of what existed beyond the limits of my vision. That ignorance was a result of a wealth of riches.  Living in Boston I had no incentive to particularly care about any other place. 

I lived in both Jamaica Plain and Hyde Park.  Both communities offered ample opportunities to explore on my own. There were corner stores and movie theaters, commercial centers known as squares, buses, an elevated train. There were woods, trees to climb, fields, sometimes with abandoned cars rusting in them, other kids' houses, school yards, places to walk, places to ride my bike, and, eventually, as my world began to expand, places to drive a car.  

Worcester and Springfield and Pittsfield wouldn't have held a candle to the Boston I knew as a kid. I had everything I wanted right in my own backyard. From a different perspective, I think Gin felt the same way.


Gin

Bill may not have heard of Pittsfield but I at least knew of Boston. I actually visited the city during high school.

Even though my parents were more focused on New York City, many of my friends and their parents were Red Sox fans.  Hearing them talk about the Sox was my main association with Boston during my childhood. To my father, however, following the Yankees was somehow more intellectual than rooting for the more blue collar Red Sox. I watched the Yankees because my parents did.

In my junior year the Pittsfield High School basketball team made it to the state finals which were held at Boston Garden. One of my friend's fathers offered to drive his daughter, another friend and me  to Boston to watch the game. On the way to the Garden, we parked somewhere near Boston Common to walk over to the Steinway music store on Boylston Street so my friend Jeanne could pick up some sheet music.  Funny to think that I may have walked by Bill that day as one of his familiar haunts, the Little Building, was right up the street.

The only other time I was in Boston before Bill and I met was with my college roommate who wanted me to have the experience of shopping at Filene's basement. I'm talking here of the original basement and not the commercial chain it later became. There were no dressing rooms; you just tried things on over your clothes, jostling for space in the aisles amidst all the seemingly crazy other women grabbing at bargains. 

I was so disoriented I wasn't able to focus on anything.  My roommate, who seemed to thrive on the chaos, found me four sweaters so I didn't go home empty-handed.  As if the shopping experience wasn't disconcerting enough, when we exited the store we weren't even on the same street as the one we were on to get into Filene's. I had no idea where we were. In Pittsfield when we went into a store you came out the same way.

Even though Pittsfield may have been a smaller city than Boston, it was very complete in its own way.  The stores on North Street offered all the variety I cared about.  Every neighborhood I lived in had it own playground and branch library. I could swim at the Girls' Club and joined the nature club at the Berkshire Museum. I was more than happy to call Pittsfield my home since I too had everything I wanted in my own backyard.

Memory: It's All In My head





The Past Remembered Anew:
How Childhood Moments Reveal   
Who We Are Now


Bill


I was eight years-old in 1953 when I moved from Jamaica Plain
to Hyde Park in Boston.  Even though I have many memories of those early childhood days in Jamaica Plain, in writing this blog I still have to confront the problem which besets all writers of memory pieces, the difference between what is real and what I remember as real.

From what I've read of recent research into the mechanics of memory, remembering anything at all is a dicey proposition.  There is working memory and long-term memory. Working memory, also called short term memory, allows us to function from moment to moment. For example, remembering how to get back to your seat at the movies when you go up for popcorn. If the movie you're watching while eating that popcorn impressed you in some way, the title, an actor's name, part of the plot, might pass into long-term memory where it could be retrieved periodically over time as circumstances warrant. It's more than just the details of the film that cause you to remember it.  There's the emotional context from the movie itself, circumstances in your life at that time, perhaps related to the particular person you shared the movie with. "I remember that. That's the movie we saw on our first date." Circumstances play a role in memory formation. "Remember rushing out of the rain to get into the warm theatre?"  Even distress is a factor. "That was the night we got back to the car after the movie  and discovered the flat tire. I hated having to call your Dad but that's what we did." These are just some of the aspects which play a role in reinforcing recall, moving remembrances  from your working memory to your long-term memory.

The old concept of memory, that of rooms filled with filing cabinets where all sorts of memory folders were stored for later perusal, has given way to something a lot more complex.  Memories are not in one place but are tangled together within different areas of the brain requiring a systemic process to bring them back into awareness. We remember people, places, events but also more ephemeral moments, the taste of a meal, the smell of the air after a storm. The brain delivers memories up to the present mind where they are processed again not in the mind in which the event occurred but in the contemporary mind.  The next time you remember the same event you recall it not from the original moment but the last moment you remembered it so that just the act of recalling something that happened years ago can alter it.


Some researchers claim that all memories are inherently unreliable, that many experiences are misremembered. This can range from things that happened to us but not in quite the way we remember, to things that never happened to us at all, that even happened to someone else who told us about them in such a way we took over their memory as one of our own. It would seem, then, for a number of reasons, the act of remembering is a distorting process.  The entire procedure seems to be a jumble of the real, the assumed and the false.

The question looms: did things really happen the way we remember?  It's clear events transpired for every minute of our lives, whether we remember them, misremember them or don't remember them at all.  This is called reality.  Those moments asleep, those moments awake, every moment was acknowledged, interpreted and then placed, permanently or otherwise, somewhere in our brains. To be where we are now we know we had to live through every second of our pasts.  There are certain people who claim they can remember every one of those seconds, from the dreams they had, to the breakfast eaten on any particular day, to what someone said to them as they waited for a bus on a specific date. To these rare few, each of those seconds is retrievable. To the rest of us, the question might be what is the value of all these real experiences if you are unable to remember any of them.  It doesn't mean they didn't happen; they did whether you remember them or not.   Many of these "lost" moments impact our lives, still do, but perhaps their significance is reduced when we are unable to recall the details

In writing this blog all I can do is declare these are my memories, flawed, distorted, and unremembered as they may be. All I have to go by in recalling my past is what's available to me. If the "facts" are not quite accurate, I am hoping the emotions supporting those memories are. My task is to convey clearly and accurately my sense of how my life played out in my early years, always realizing the limitations imposed by the mechanics of memory formation, retention and recall.   

By way of example, I offer two memories. One is something I don't personally recall, the memory is of my parents telling me the story; the other I remember without prompting. 

The one I don't personally recall happened in Jamaica Plain when I was 5 years-old or so. I was playing with another kid on the street just in front of my house.  My house was on a dead end so there wasn't any traffic. The street wasn't paved; it was more of a short gravelly driveway to the houses along it.  The woman we rented our house from, Mrs. Costello, lived above us.  The street in front was often rutted with potholes.  Since we burned coal Mrs. Costello would have someone lug a few buckets of ash and cinders from the coal furnace to fill up the holes. For some reason my playmate threw a handful of this dirt/ash/cinder stuff into my face. 

Maybe we were making dirt and ash mud pies?  Did I taunt him? "Your mud pies are stupid!" Were we playing and then fighting? Was he just a bully? I don't know. I was told I was blinded and began screaming.  My father was home at the time. He and my mother dragged me into the house where my father, using a small rubber hose that was attached to the faucet in the kitchen sink, washed out my eyes.  My father said if he hadn't been there and knew enough to use the hose I might have suffered serious eye injury.  "You were a hospital case," was the way he described it in telling the story. He said it frightened him seeing so much debris in my eyes; they were literally full of dirt and those glassy particles from the ash and cinders.  To this day I don't remember a bit of this, the crying, the panic, being held while the water splashed in my eyes.  It must have been awful.  What I do recall is my parents telling me about it. They recalled it vividly because of the trauma associated with it. In my case, with my particular brain physiology, the trauma caused me to forget it.

There is a moment I do remember on my own from about the same time, when I was four or so, in 1949. I was in morning kindergarten and when my school day ended I would come home for lunch.  The school was right behind my house so I was able to walk home. I sat at the table in our kitchen where my mother would make me lunch of baked potatoes and carrots mashed together. I loved those.  (What kid wouldn't!)  I associate that lunch with the space and shape of the kitchen, the texture of the food, warm and moist and grainy, and the comfort of my mother moving about in the dim light getting it ready and then placing it in front of me. I think I even remember the weight of the fork with which I ate it.  What I did after lunch I couldn't say. 

Part of the reason the lunch stands out is the fact my mother talked about it for years afterwards. She reinforced the memory.  "When you were a kid I'd make potatoes and carrots for you."  The reason she spoke of it wasn't to recall the carefree days of my childhood but to illustrate her point that we were easier to take care of when we were that age. "You would eat anything." This in contrast to the ages I was when she mentioned it, 10 or 12 or 15, ages when the control she had over my behavior was less and less. I will still insist I remember those lunches based on my own memory of the specific time but there is no doubt the recall has been altered somewhat by my mother's own need to remind me of it.  In a way it's a mixed memory, some of my own, some of my memory of her recalling it. 

Certainly there are aspects of both sets of memories that have altered over time. Sometimes when I was told about the dirt in the eyes there was more a sense of relief that I was okay than the terror of the moment, and I probably have romanticized the lunch story depending on my mood at the time of recall.  The main difference is I remember the lunch. When my mother mentioned it I'd say to her, "Yeah, I remember that.  I remember sitting in that kitchen, the one with the big iron stove in it."  When my father would talk about the kid throwing dirt in my eyes, hard as I tried, I did not recall anything about it.  The lunch is my memory; the dirt incident is my parents' memory.  Ultimately, though, is there any difference?  Both events happened. Perhaps the difference is the dirt in the eyes could have happened to someone else whereas the lunch story I know happened to me.  Lunch with my mother is a complete memory, complex, emotional.  The kid throwing dirt in my face is an incomplete memory, the knowledge of which comes from the people who were there.  Except for me!

Gin thoughtfully summed up her dilemma with the vagaries of remembering by posing a question.  "If my family took more photographs, would I have more memories?"  You may not remember going on that trip or having that person as a friend but here it is in this photograph so it must be true.  I have photographs I could look at. I also have family members I could ask but then I'd only be writing about their memories, their conceptions of what I did, how I felt, what I thought; things they cannot know from my point of view.  At the same time there are things I could not write about without another person's recollections, or from a memory triggered by a photograph.  Without these other sources I simply would not remember some moments in my life. 

In some ways memories brought back by talking with other people or looking at photographs can be misinterpreted.  Instead of a clear evocation of a certain event, a memory of it is impacted by the alternate source. I'd think, "Did that happen just that way or do I think it did because of what my mother or brother said years later."  A classic criticism of photography is that photographs lie.  What tells the story in a photograph is often what is beyond the edges of the frame or is distorted in some way, the hand that is holding yours, the blurred house in the background.  Whose hand is that? Did I live in that house?  More questions are raised than answered.

Ultimately I won't have as much input into the accuracy of the events related here as I would like. I won't knowingly, blatantly, make anything up and will do the best I can to give the reader a sense of what my years as a young kid were about, using my recollections as a construct on which I will hang an overall impression of those years. I guess you can say any memoir must have a solid foundation even though the framework can be a bit wobbly and it doesn't have a roof.  Quibble as I will with some of the details, the overall structure will be sound.  After all Jamaica Plain and Hyde Park existed then, they still exist, and I know I lived there.  Thinking about my past as still open to interpretation means that time is still an ongoing flow, that my past still influences me, and influences my future. 

Finally, it's important to recognize these are real people about whom I write.  I wish to do them, me, no disservice. I'll strive to show them no worse or better than they were. I'll build this shaky world of recall on a strong foundation of honesty.  I'll transmute the ambiguity of "The details of my life may not have unfolded quite as I recall," to the unshakable reality of "There is nothing in this blog that is not intrinsically true."  

So based on my own memories and with the help of family photographs, family stories and with faith in my own ability to assess my past from a genuine and heartfelt perspective, I give you some impressions of my life as a kid.

Surroundings






The Past Remembered Anew:
How Childhood Moments Reveal   
Who We Are Now


Bill

The street on which I lived in Jamaica Plain, Adams Circle, is about four miles from Boston's City Hall Plaza.  In my current life that is walking distance as I often walk three to four miles in an afternoon. As a kid I knew of only one way to get to downtown Boston. Take the elevated train.  If someone had suggested I could walk to Boston from my house in JP, my disbelieving response would have been, "That's so far away.  No one could walk that. It would take a month!" 


Within my neighborhood I was bounded not only by what I felt I was capable of but also by the parameter of streets I felt I should not cross.  In my mind I had a safe zone beyond which I did not venture and a concept of distance in which a mile was at the outer extreme.

My world in Jamaica Plain was delineated by an area enclosed by Armory Street on the west, Atherton to the north, Washington Street and Egleston Square to the east and Montebello to the south. It wouldn't have bothered me if nothing else existed beyond the space defined by these streets.  Within this boundary was my world.  Parents, grandparents, friends.  Schools, schoolyards, stores.  I played here, I slept here, I ate here.  It rained here, it snowed here, spring showed up every year as did summer.   I lived here.  I grew up here.  I really never had to leave.

My Jamaica Plain neighborhood was laced with familiar streets on which I walked to get to school and to friend's houses, on which I played, discovered and explored. They all seemed to have wonderful names. 

Down from Adams Circle was School Street. Yes, there was a school on it, my school, the Ellis Mendell.  My parents lived on School Street when they first got married. It's where my father's mother and father still lived when I was a kid. Down from Adams Circle was Dalrymple Street where my older sister's friends lived, where I would play tag and hide and seek on summer evenings I wished would never end.  Adams Circle was a dead end but not dead ended by a cul de sac or empty lot but by a set of stairs. Cars couldn't go any further but I could. I loved the sense of moving from one level, Adams Circle, down the stairs to another, Dalrymple Street, almost as if I were moving from the wings to the stage, a place where I could play and explore and be free.

Dalrymple was an L, the elbow of which was at Adams Circle.  The short side went down to Boylston Street, the longer end went over to Egleston Street.  Egleston led down to Haverford Street where my other set of grandparents lived, my mother's family.  My grandmother's house looked down to Montebello, one of my self-imposed boundary streets.

Taking the other part of the Dalrymple L down to Boylston I would walk with a friend down Armory where the local corner store was.  The far side of Armory was bounded by a massive granite wall, some of the locals called it Hadrian's Wall because of the way it effectively cut off one section of Jamaica Plain from the other.  The wall was a filled embankment on top of which were the tracks that carried the New York, New Haven and Hartford railroad to and from Boston.

My friends lived on the up side of Adams Circle.  As a kid it was always "down" to Dalrymple and "up" to  School Street.   Paralleling School Street was Atherton Street which was linked by both Copley Street and Arcadia Street.  All great Boston street names.  Atherton was my, mostly, northern boundary, although as I got older I began to venture, timidly, down Columbus Avenue. 

A left on School Street from Adams Circle took me down to Armory; a right took me up to Washington Street and Egleston Square. At that time the square was still a bustling commercial center. This was my eastern terminus but what a street it was.  My parents knew it well during  their early married lives replete as it was with places to buy cheese and tea, pastries, fruits and vegetables, meats and deli, places to bring shoes to be cobbled, shirts to be laundered, along with lunch counters to sit at, and the Egleston Theatre in which to watch movies.

Keeping the street dark and dappled was the MTA, the elevated train, on which I would ride when my mother took my brother and me into Boston, "in town".  When I was older I'd also explore Egleston Square on my own or with a friend. It could be a bit dangerous.  Not only from the automobiles but you also had to keep an eye out for the streetcars that were back and forth day and night.  Often you'd hear the trolley bell before you were aware they were bearing down on you.

There were a number of what we might today call supermarkets in the square.  Not as streamlined, not as big as today but they were always crowded and seemed jammed with every type of food, much of it in cases, over ice and in barrels.  I remember the First National, the A&P, and Lodgen's market, the store my parents would shop at.

On Washington at Beethoven Street was the Egleston movie theatre.  My mother and her cousins would see a movie here just about every week for years before, during and after the war.  I too recall attending Saturday afternoons with my brother or with a friend.  Next to the movie theatre was the fire station which always held a certain fascination for me.  

I remember the JP neighborhood with a certain fondness.  There was always a lot to do, always places to go, something different to explore.  At the ages of six and seven, when I was out and about on my own, I felt safe there.

Have things changed all that much or was it safer then for kids to be out on their own without a parent supervising or driving them everywhere or even asking them where they were going?  A best selling book from the 1950s was titled, "Where did you go? Out.  What did you do? Nothing."  That sums it up. Be wary of thinking being Out and doing Nothing were boring.  It wasn't, and even it were, it's being bored under a kid's own terms.

As for safety, well, I was active so the risk of injury was high although it was contained to cuts and bruises.  I was definitely warned, mostly in a general way, about talking with strangers, and in a specific way about not taking candy from strangers.  I was never sure what that meant; why would someone I didn't know be offering me candy?  So I knew to be wary of certain situations but that knowledge did not translate into so much anxiety that it would inhibit me from exploring my neighborhood, my own little world. Be sure, in my days kids did get hurt, they hurt each other, they fought, they played rough, they broke bones, got scratched up, felt real fear, but none of what might happen precluded kids from getting out and enjoying what did happen.

When I was a kid my parents' greatest fear was likely their kids' catching some sort of disease. The very word "disease" still imparts a vague sense of foreboding.  Polio was a big deal, as were German measles and whooping cough.  Accidents too were a concern.  Many of the toys we played with were hardly safe, and we never wore a helmet when riding a bike. "Watch out for cars," was something my mother would yell to me as I walked out the door. There was risk but as a kid the bigger risk was missing out on the adventure of being with your friends especially on a summer's night as darkness fell, when both the dangers and excitement increased. Having fun always won out over everything else

I sometimes think of that maze of streets as my very own movie backlot where I could imagine all sorts of situations brought to life in complex play scenarios with my friends or just wandering around with my own imagination in place. The neighborhood's topography gave me my bearings, a place to allay my childhood angst; those Jamaica Plain streets provided me the stage on which I fulfilled my needs and my longings and even the dreams I was barely aware I had.  It's these extraordinary moments I gladly share.   

Neighborhoods


The Past Remembered Anew:
How Childhood Moments Reveal   
Who We Are Now


Gin
In Surroundings, Bill wrote about the neighborhood where he lived as a kid.  He offers a coherent image of his corner of Jamaica Plain.  For me, my childhood neighborhoods were disconnected. In Pittsfield, my parents moved frequently when I was a kid, living in a number of different places before finally settling into the house in which I would live until Bill and I married.
As a child, the area in which I would play, my neighborhood, was limited to some few blocks around wherever I was living at the time. I was familiar with those streets but I could never connect them with the places I had lived previously or the next place I would eventually move to.  To me Pittsfield was like a map torn into jagged pieces with some parts missing.  This doesn't mean I felt lost. In each of my neighborhoods, I knew where the corner store was, how to get to the playground and different ways to walk to my school. 
It was only later I was able to piece these neighborhoods together with no gaps.  When I did this, there were surprises.  Once I took Bill on a tour showing him some of the places I lived as a child.  During that tour I noticed the house I lived in when I was in 6th grade was just a few blocks away from where I lived in 3rd grade. I was shocked to see just how close they were. I could easily have walked between them, but they were as far apart in my memory as if they had been in different cities. The friends I had in 3rd grade were totally different from the neighborhood friends I played with in 6th grade. Though practically next door, these third and sixth grade neighborhoods had no overlap. I had no sense at the time they were so close.   
The first house I lived in was on Winship Avenue, a still quiet, still rural street past Pontoosuc Lake in the north part of the city. My first move was to Beech Grove Avenue when I was two. I don’t remember this move myself.  However, there is a family story about this move, one often told. Likely in the telling, it became altered just a bit each time, shaped to get a reaction from the listeners or to highlight the reason this particular story was told at the time.  In any case, my parents were wondering, worried even, about how I would accept this move.  They were quite pleased when I seemed to settle into the new place, happily playing in my new room with my dolls and toys. Near dinner time, my parents were taking a break from unpacking, likely having a glass of sherry, when they noticed I was piling up my stuffed animals, toys and books at the front door, emptying my new room. They surmised that I figured now that it was getting dark it was time to go home.  
Sometimes this story was told to show how cute I was; other times I was compared to one of our cats who wouldn’t move with us and kept returning to our older house rather than live in the new one, and sometimes my mother told the story as an example of a phrase she used, “We didn’t bring you up. You brought yourself up."
Like many family stories this one seems to leave out more than it tells.  What was my reaction when they told me we were not going to go back to what I thought of as home? How many of my things had I actually moved to the front door?   Didn’t I notice all the furniture we owned was in this new place?  Did I do this again the next evening? I must have listened to this story a hundred times and never thought to ask any of these questions.  Didn’t I want to know more?  Why was I content accepting the story in the context in which it was told?  Family stories like these just assumed a place in the background of my life; they only stand out now in relief as I ponder the questions they raise for me.
Here is another family story complete with all its missing pieces. I suspect it was Beech Grove Avenue, the house on the west side of Pittsfield, the only time we ever lived in that section.  I was three.  I had been playing in the yard when my mother noticed I had wandered from her view. I recall picking flowers and following a trail from one patch of flowers to the next not very conscious of how far I had gone. (Do I really remember following this flower trail or did I come up with this reason for wandering off during some retelling?)
I don’t know how long it took my mother to realize I had left the yard.  She seemed to know what direction to take feeling great relief when she spotted me sitting outside an old shed with an even older and bearded man.  As my mother neared she somehow realized I was in no danger.  It turns out this man was a violinmaker and the shed was where he worked.  Violins in various stages of completion adorned the walls.  My mother’s love of music made her believe that any man who loved violins and could create one from wood wouldn’t cause me any harm.  My mother told me later the man was a hermit.  For many years I associated the word hermit with violins without realizing what the word meant.
I wonder now was this man a neighbor?  Did my mother ever talk to him again?  What was he doing making violins in the woods in Pittsfield!  Sometimes I wonder if this really happened.  A great story but with missing pieces.
When we lived at Curtis Street I was still too young for school.  In this neighborhood, my third, that would have been the Rice School.  In Pittsfield at this time, kindergarten was not yet mandatory and so school began with first grade at age five.  I still remember how strongly I felt about wanting to go to school.  I really didn't know anything about school but I still wanted to go.  I do wonder what I felt was so appealing about school?  We didn't have a TV so Ding Dong School wasn't a factor.  Whatever I thought it was, I wanted to be a part of it.  
I am looking at a family photo. It shows my mother and father, my older brother and me standing at the entrance to Rice School. We were out for a Sunday walk.  As I contemplate this image, a feeling comes over me, anger.  I remember now that I was so mad at my brother that day.  Angry, because he was going to go to this school the next day and I wasn't. 
My yearning, my readiness for school did not go unnoticed.  Both my parents knew it was the best thing for me. There was, however, the bureaucracy to deal with. To attend first grade in the fall, you needed to be five by February 1 of that year. I wouldn't be five until the end of March. That meant it would be a whole extra year before I could get into first grade.  Yet, when September rolled around, there I was, a first grader at Rice school.  It wasn't until years later I found out how my mother had made that happen.
Flash ahead to when I was sixteen.  My next door neighbor had a part time job at a local movie theater. She told me the owner was looking to hire someone to work the candy counter.  I went to city hall to get working papers only to discover my birthday as listed in their school records was January 30. That's odd.  I'd been celebrating on March 30 for the past 16 years. I showed them my birth certificate with the March 30 date to enable them to change their records. I walked home wondering how they could have made such an error. I had my working papers but what was on my mind was the city's mistake. I went on and on about it at home. My mother kept trying to dismiss it.  "Someone just wrote the wrong date, that's all."  But I kept peppering her with questions.  "Don't they check things out?  How come no one ever noticed?"  Finally she turned to me in embarrassment. "I lied to them.  It was important for you to start school earlier than they allowed." I was astonished.  My mother told a lie. To the government no less! I only knew her to be gentle, kind, and truthful. This was amazing to me, but also clearly upsetting to her.  She didn't want to admit it even to me. 
So, thanks to my mother's intervention, I did enter first grade at the Rice School but ironically, after all that, I recall nothing about it.  In fact, for years I misremembered that I had even attended Rice School assuming I had been at Crane School for first grade.  However, the evidence, a musty yellowed report card from Rice, belies that memory.  Why is it the memory of my anger that day at my brother is so vivid that I still feel the emotions I felt at the time yet I spent an entire year at Rice School after longing for that experience yet remember nothing about it.  I do have that photo to stir my memory, a photo which I've looked at numerous times, each time reinforcing the emotional memories of that Sunday. I often think if my family had taken more photos, I’d have more memories.
Stanley Avenue, where we lived while I was in second and third grade at the Crane School, marked a great time for me. We lived just up the street from the school. Next to the to the schoolyard, there was a city-run playground. I felt a strong sense of community in this neighborhood, a kind of Father Knows Best feel. Perhaps it was a combination of the place and the times when the clichés of the 50's seemed real. To me it was magical.
On summer evenings, there would be movies to watch at the playground. I'm not talking Gone with the Wind here; I remember cartoons and short subjects.  My favorites would run along the lines of a Casper the Ghost short and a Ma and Pa Kettle feature.  Every once in a while we convinced the person running the projector to run one of the short subjects backwards; watching someone propel themselves out of a swimming pool and land perfectly on the diving board was hysterical. 
I didn't go to movies on a regular basis so this was a particularly exciting event in my life.  There was so much to do to prepare. The whole neighborhood would take part.  Parents would make cupcakes, popcorn, brownies and then sell them to make money for the next playground event.  It's funny when you think of it.  They would make the cupcakes and then give us kids money to go buy them. Not much of a business plan but it seemed to work. There was this sense that everyone would talk about this for days, my friends, our parents, everyone busy preparing for the big night. Even the people who lived downstairs who had no kids would get involved. I'm sure the sound was tinny and the projected film flickered and maybe even broke but to me those summer nights at the playground in the dark, watching and eating and laughing, were some of the highlights of my days at Stanley.  
The city hired college students to be counselors at the Crane playground for the summer months. The counselors would set up games, supervise special events, and organize arts and crafts.  When I told Bill about these activities, we both laughed at the memory of gimp. There was gimp in his childhood playgrounds as well. What the heck is gimp anyway?  Gimp is a thin plastic strip, brightly colored, used in arts and crafts for lacing projects.
There was always one counselor who seemed to specialize in gimp. A group of us would sit under a tree working our little fingers braiding lanyards and bracelets.  The counselor was there to help out, especially at the end when you had to crimp what you were working on so it wouldn't unravel. I really wasn't very good at it.  I only mastered one kind of weave, braiding. This meant I could only make lanyard after lanyard after lanyard.  Before that summer, I didn't even know what a lanyard was and now I had tons of them. How many people did I know who wanted to wear a whistle around their necks? If we did other arts and crafts activities besides making things out of gimp, I can't recall.  I recently Googled gimp.  It's still available, more in Europe than here in the US, but I suspect that children who go off to summer camp will be enjoying the gimping of lanyards for years to come.
I was thrilled at being trusted to walk over to the Crane playground by myself. No need for my older brother (who would have thought I was a bother in any case) to take me. I am seven. I can walk across the street to the playground on my own.  To make this work, my mother and I had a system. When she pulled the shade down halfway in the upstairs bedroom window, that was a sign for me to come home.  I loved the sense of freedom that gave me.  However, on that tour I took with Bill showing him where I lived as a kid, we realized no part of the house on Stanley was even visible from the playground.  So where does this leave my memory of looking up to see the shade pulled halfway down and knowing it was time to go home?   Did I make up this idea because I liked the sense of freedom?  Did I just go home on my own imagining how neat it would be to have such a signal? It might have been possible to see the shade if I walked over to the adjacent Crane schoolyard.  I grew up telling people this story about the window shade so at one time I believed it. With the way memory works, each time I told this story the more certain I was it happened. But today looking toward Stanley from the site of the playground it's clear it's not physically possible to even see the house.  It really is a cool memory but it may not be an accurate one
I’ve written a lot about my life at Dewey Avenue.  Check out Teachers, Excitements and Neighborhood Cultures for more.  The move to Dewey from Stanley came during a tough time for my parents.  While the house we were moving to had more rooms so my brother and I didn’t have to share, it was in a poorer section of Pittsfield.  A strike at the GE where my father worked had lasted two months; money was very tight.  
My mother disliked the idea this new place was a six family house, a triple-decker. At Stanley we rented from a family who not only owned it but also lived there.  This gave us the feeling we lived in a home, not an apartment. This new place on Dewey was too much like a big city tenement building for my mother. There was no grassy yard, just gravel around the house. I don't remember her complaining about these new living arrangements but I picked up her sense of disappointment.  I did check out the neighborhood playground once or twice in the summer but unlike at Crane there were fewer activities with only a handful of kids participating.
There was an activity I do remember; in fact, I still have the award I won.  One day I read an announcement on the wall of the little supply shed at the playground that there would be a doll contest the next week. I immediately went home to peruse my collection.  I realized most of my favorites were not dolls but stuffed animals which I felt did not qualify.  I did have one fairly traditional doll, dressed a little bit like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz.  I asked my mother, my consultant in this matter, to iron the doll's dress while I tried to fix her hair.  
Came the day of the event I carefully carried my red-haired doll with her blue bow and blue dress to the playground.  We all arranged our dolls on a picnic table that had been commandeered for that purpose.  I don't remember much about the competition. I do remember my excitement when they held up my doll and announced that it had won for being "the prettiest scarlet red-haired doll with the prettiest blue eyes."  It took me years to realize the counselors made up certificates so that each kid who entered the doll contest received one.  Probably some girl won an award for having the tallest doll with black satin shoes. It was that specific.  At the event I don’t recall feeling my award wasn’t special enough. I didn’t even notice that everyone won one.  Even though I was happy enough with my certificate, I eventually lost interest in the playground; my new focus was now on roller skating and jump roping on the streets near our new house.
Living on Dewey had an impact on both my brother and me.  We reacted to the same set of circumstances, our parents' financial hard times, in very different ways.  I developed a sense that people should be given the benefit of the doubt rather than being judged by where they lived or how they dressed. When I looked around my 4th grade classroom in this poor part of the city, I became convinced the only thing we all had in common was lack of money.  As opposed to the impression my teacher gave us, we weren’t lacking in character or morals; our future success and happiness was not determined by our present unfortunate circumstances.  Obviously a 9 year-old isn't able to conceptualize this kind of social attitude but I am thinking now the seeds of such a life philosophy were planted then.
These same hard times affected my brother differently. Whether it was because he was older or male, I don’t know. He made decisions based on what would provide financial security.  I can imagine him thinking, “I am determined to make enough money to take care of my family, now and in the future, so they don't have to live in a place like this.”  As a fourteen year-old my brother actually lied about his age in order to get a part time job. Evidently a family tendency. From then on in his life he always had a job.  His interest in feeling secure can be seen in the important decisions he made. When the time came to apply for college he pursued a career as an electrical engineer rather than following his interest in liberal arts. While living in the poorer section of Pittsfield may have contributed to my liberal social beliefs, the same situation contributed to my brother's more conservative philosophy. As we got older and became adults and parents ourselves, these differences showed up not only in our political choices but also in the ways we raised our children. 
My life on Dewey lasted two years. In the summer of 1955, between fifth and sixth grades, we moved to Plunkett Street.  We were all up early to get prepared, anxious to get started, but the truck did not show up as expected at 9 that morning.  By 10 o'clock my mother wanted my father to call his friend which my father was reluctant to do as the friend was doing us a favor by moving us.  "He'll be here. Just wait a little longer," my father said.   Eventually my father did get in touch only to find out the move would be delayed until sometime that evening.  I remember standing out in the street waiting and waiting. The lateness of the move made it particularly difficult for us since everything, dishes, food, was all packed away.  
My mother had a different concern, that the neighbors would think we were skipping out on the rent, moving like this after dark. A situation not unheard of in this neighborhood. Once we got over to Plunkett, we did some initial unpacking. I felt very grown up because my mother put me in charge of setting up my baby sister's crib. My mother told me she was so tired that night the flower pattern on the wallpaper in the baby's room seemed to be moving. "It was like a 3-D effect," she told me.  "The flowers were floating in front of my eyes." 
One of the best things about the move to Plunkett was that I was back at my favorite school, Crane.  You can read about my sixth grade year in the blog entry, Teachers. Walking there was a much longer trek than it had been when I walked there from Stanley.  The walk to school from Plunkett involved negotiating a steep hill, steep to me anyway, then along the sidewalk five or six blocks. We never had lunch at school, but went home at noon and were expected back at 1:30, so I did this walk four times a day in all kinds of weather.  Interesting to think now the entire city school schedule was dependent on mothers being home to give their kids lunch.  On bad weather days, the school system had a policy of never calling off school, simply saying if parents felt it was unsafe, keep your child home.  I don’t recall ever staying home in bad weather but surely with Massachusetts' winters being what they are, I must have. 
Even though I was back at the Crane School, the playground situation and sense of community I recalled from earlier times did not excite me like it once did.  Maybe I thought the playground was too far away; maybe I avoided the hill when I didn’t need to walk it; maybe I was old enough to be interested in something other than gimp.  I found I liked going to stores at this point since I was now old enough to be on my own, For whatever reason, I spent my leisure time moving in a different direction—down the hill, across fairly busy Tyler Street to a commercial area that had a few stores, an ice cream shop and a neighborhood branch of the city library. 
I loved the building the library was in.  From Tyler Street there were two doors into a large reading room. (I'm thinking it must have been a commercial block at one time.)  The reading room was large since there were no stacks; the books were in shelves along the side walls and in back.  I liked this space, especially what I considered my spot.  Between the two doors was a built-in bench, a window seat looking out onto the busy street.  I loved sitting in that window area with a book whiling away the time, half reading, half watching people go by. 
The other reason I didn’t go back to my old playground was that the Plunkett house was right next door to a Catholic school with its own schoolyard in which to play. I was home from school at roughly the same time as the Catholic school let out so I had this whole area to myself. I used to do ball games and hopscotch. I very much enjoyed the challenge of the solitaire ball games. With each bounce of the ball off the school's back wall I needed to do a different movement. "...one foot, the other foot, front claps, back claps...salute, curtsey, and away we go..." This involved a whole lengthy sequence of things I would do while catching the ball.  If I dropped the ball I had to start all over again.  And when I was done with the first sequence, I'd do it all over again with one of the movements fixed throughout the whole next sequence.  I was so involved in this game I could do it for hours. I would sing out the motions as I played. Later when I told Bill about it, he thought the best part of it was the "tweedles and twaddles" sequences, rotating your hands in front of you one way and then the other, and he only liked it because it sounded like characters from Alice in Wonderland.  He admitted to me much later that he also did tweedles and twaddles in some of his games but never knew that's what they were called.

What I considered my playground wasn’t just a school, it was a whole complex: St Mary's, a school, a convent, a rectory and a huge church.  In 1955 the Catholic Church was an major part of Pittsfield life.  This area was busy every day. School kids. Church goers. Weddings. Nuns. Priests.  Now, in 2015, it is literally abandoned.  There are plans to demolish it to make way for a drive- up restaurant.  In visiting the old church complex with Bill, he noted how expansive the area was with different levels, stairways connecting the various grassy areas and buildings. "This is a fascinating place," he told me.  "It's like a museum.  It's sad in a way the purpose for it being here, religious community, has dissipated."  He was also intrigued by "my" playground, now a broken expanse of asphalt, weeds struggling in the cracks, the sounds of the parochial school kids playing, my playing, long faded away.
I suppose when I lived next door, had I been more adventurous, I might have explored that church area more, but I was unfamiliar with any kind of religious community and definitely intimidated by Catholic sisters and priests, unsure how to act near them. I wasn't even sure if I should be singing at the schoolyard while I played. So I didn't venture beyond where I spent my after school afternoons tweedling and twaddling.  
The one member of our family that didn't seem to like Plunkett was our cat.  All our cats spent a lot of time outdoors. Each morning of those first few days at our new house we would call her to be fed but she was nowhere to be found.  On that first morning of our move we received a phone call from a neighbor back at Dewey telling us our cat was at our old back porch. My brother took his bike back to the old house, picked up the cat transporting her back to our new place.  But the next morning, calling her for food, she was missing again. She was back to Dewey.  After three days of this, my brother refused to go back on his bike to get her. "What's the point!" he exclaimed. There wasn't much we could do.  Our cat cared more about her territory at the old house than she did about the people feeding her at the new one. We ended up giving the cat to a willing neighbor in the old neighborhood.  At least that was what I was told.
After only a year at Plunkett, we moved again in October. This time to Montgomery Avenue, the house we would live in until I went to college. For me it was the beginning of seventh grade.  I had been taking the bus to my new school, North Junior High. It was the first time I'd ever taken a bus to school; I had always walked.  But the new house on Montgomery was close to the junior high so I'd soon be walking again.
This move was the first time I connected an old neighborhood to a new one.  On Saturdays that fall, shortly before we moved, I’d ride my bike from Plunkett over to Montgomery. I loved the idea I had my own first-hand impressions of the house and the street.  I didn't have to rely upon what my parents told me about our new place. I could go see for myself. It was as if I had some special knowledge. 
My seventh house was a two-family side by side duplex with a screened-in front porch and a large back yard adorned with a huge weeping willow tree. The street dead-ended at a field.  Our side of the street had about twenty houses, mostly two-family; the right hand side had more modern one-family capes. I was now able to connect my old and new neighborhoods. As I traveled back and forth between them, I put together at last that torn map of Pittsfield. 
So you see, my family moved a lot between the time I was born in 1945 and the fall of 1956. I don't remember these changes as being upsetting, but rather as opening new possibilities.  What would my new school be like?  What route would I take to walk there? What new friends would I make?  What would the playground have in it?  What path would we take to the lake?  What route would lead us to the Fourth of July fireworks? What branch of the library would we visit?  What streets would we walk to go to North Street? What corner store would we use?  Somehow, instead of feeling unsettled by such frequent moves, the experience made me look at change as positive. I wasn’t thinking about what I would leave behind or miss. I was anticipating what new things I might encounter or find. I don’t know if this was an inborn tendency on my part or if my parents interacted with me in such a way to make this point, but I do know I always looked at the next move as an adventure.